Examination of how changes to NCCD funding and the SRS review affect special assistance schools that serve highly vulnerable students and those impacted by trauma.
Speakers: Ms. Meg Brighton, Senator Matt O'Sullivan, Mr. Tony Cook, Unknown Speaker
EducationGovernment spendingMs. Meg BrightonSenator Matt O'SullivanMr. Tony CookUnknown SpeakerSenate Education and Employment Legislation CommitteeSupplementary Budget Estimates 2026–27Senate Education and Employment Legislation Committee, 29 Oct 202611570
Transcript
Senator Matt O'Sullivan
so Miss Brown will you use the term rightsizing mean sounds like adifferent way of saying cut I supposeum so I use the word cut umbecause what you're talking about hereis a measure which achieves $472million in savings if I understand itover the four uh over the forwardestimatesso how does that when you've got such asizable cut, h how can that not resultin a reduction in the delivery ofsupport for for students in in these
Mr. Tony Cook
schools?>> As Mr. Brighton said, it's actuallyensuring the right children are gettingthe right levels of support. And when wehave gone in with some of our auditswhere we've had children um allocated toparticularly c particular categories ofsupport, we have found that some ofthose students either don't need thatlevel of support or actually need moresupport. And so there's movement betweenthe two. Um and that's really importantto ensure that that money is targeted inthe best way possible. But again, MissBrighton will be able to give somespecific examples of that.
Ms. Meg Brighton
>> Yeah. So, Senator, some of the things wehave um we have seen is as SecretaryCook said um is the student uh at the atthe level of support that they need asone element. So, sometimes they areunderdone, sometimes they are overdone,but importantly then are they gettingthat support? So, is that support beingprovided by the school to the student?And that's a really important part ofthis um how we're looking at it. So it'snot only what is the student assessed atand what do they need but is the schoolactually providing that. Uh and then wehave also through the consultation workthat we did for these higher levels ofadjustment um the requirement is thatthe student who needs the most intenselevel of support is getting it um over10 consecutive weeks. We also heardthrough the consultation that sometimesthat's pretty complex when you look atthe student characteristics of some ofthose students that need it. So in thenew guidelines, we have also offered anoption where it's either 10 consecutiveweeks of evidence or it's 20 cumulativeweeks of evidence to give schools a lotmore flexibility about how they um uhdemonstrate the need of that individualstudent. Um and what our audits havepointed to just as Secretary Cook saidis not only um some students not beingclassified at high enough levels, we'vehad other students that have either umthe uh the the nature of the disabilityor the nature of the adjustmentsnecessary have been overstated orsometimes uh there's not even adisability at all in that young person.
Senator Matt O'Sullivan
>> Have you had uh feedback from specialassistance schools in particular? Um,these are schools that are working withsome of the most, in fact, arguablydefinitely the most vulnerable studentsin each state and territory.uh the the ones that I've been to inWestern Australia uh have have studentswith very high levels of need, notnecessarily disabilities from a you knowthat might be measured under under orcaptured under this but you know verysignificant home lives and so umbackgrounds and issues. Um the next stepfor the you know they don't fit within amainstream school system. they've maybebeen expelled from those schools um forbehavior reasons and other reasons.Essentially the next step for thesestudents and to be really blunt about itand I don't mean to be impolite but iseither uh is either in hospital becauseum them um you know self harming and andthose sort of issues or in fact you knowsuicide uh and uh or or or in correctioncenters because of the the crime thatthey can lead to. Um these schools areon their knees is what I'm hearing. Um Iknow of one particular school that'sthat's having to close um campusesaround the state of Western Australia umbecause of I guess there's a bit of aconflation of the the change in um howthey're I think they're deeming or howthey're assessed under the SCS and andthen this issue here with the NCCD. Um,so are you are you gettingrepresentations from those schools aboutthe multitude of issues that thatthey're contending with and theirviability going forward?
Ms. Meg Brighton
>> So there's a a few elements um to that.There is no doubt that our schools needto be able to support young people whoare um impacted by trauma, who arehomeless, who have a degree ofcomplexibility and vulnerability aroundtheir lives. And our schools need to beable to provide a supportive place forthem to come to and to learn and togrow. Um the um under the uh school'sreform and uh funding agreement we havea piece of work um which is going to bea review of the schooling resourcestandard and the scope of that reviewit's in the process of being settlingsettling uh but one of the things wewill look at is does the SRS um as it'scurrently um constructors have regard tothe contemporary cost of schooling andparticularly as we look at um thoseelements of intersectionality aboutdifferent vulnerabilities. Uh so I'vesaid to the SAS schools that I've metwith that as part of the SRS review, we
Senator Matt O'Sullivan
will>> seem to be in this no man's land of likethere there are they got unique needscompared to the rest of the schoolpopulation.
Ms. Meg Brighton
>> Yeah, Senator, and that's why as part ofthe SRS review, we will look at that.The other thing I would say is that umuh specialist assistant schools aren'tsubjected to the or the policy of thecapacity to contribute doesn't apply tothem. Um we have been working with someum special assistant schools that mayhave made reference to uh reshaping oftheir programs. Uh when that happens, wework with them. Some of those schoolshave significant asset holdings and cashholdings that actually what they can dois they can deploy those holdings whichis often accumulation of Australiangovernment funding that they can use tocontinue to support students.