Officials discuss Australia's obligations under the Treaty of Rarotonga and the policy of neither confirming nor denying the presence of nuclear weapons on visiting platforms.
ADFInternational lawNational securityDavid ShoebridgeMeghan QuinnSenate Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Legislation CommitteeSupplementary Budget Estimates 2026–27Senate Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Legislation Committee, 29 Oct 202615060
Transcript
David Shoebridge
Well, of course, Foreign Minister Wongin her April 2023 National Press Clubaddressmade it very clear that Orca submarinesvisiting Australia would beconventionally armedand made it very clear to the public.Well, of course, now the US has changedits policy. It's investing billions ofdollars to enable its Virginia classsubmarinesum to have nuclear armed sea launchedcapable ballistic missiles.Um, at any point has the governmentcome forward and told the public, well,actually what we were saying beforeabout them not being nuclear armed,well, that's now wrong because the UShas changed its policy. And while we'renot going to confirm or deny, there isabsolutely a very real possibpossibility or asRepresentative McCall says, it's logicalto assume that now US Virginia classsubmarines, at least some of them willbe nuclear armed. Have have you comeclean with the Australian public andsaid this at any point? Uh so Senator,
Meghan Quinn
you asked you you you you're making awhole series of assumptions uh in yourquestion to officials around uhtestimony or discussion of a US officialprojecting that to be US officialpolicy. That is an assumption that Icannot verify on the basis of theinformation you've provided. TheAustralian government's been very clearum and uh we have obligations under thetreaty of Roratunga. We have also beenclear about the nuclear um propulsioncapability which is very different fromnuclear weapons. Um and so I I havenothing to add to the officialgovernment statements which have beenvery clear about government policy.