Discussion regarding complaints from the Farm Transparency Project about animal cruelty at slaughterhouses and the specific regulatory actions taken by the Commonwealth in response.
Animal welfareExportsSpeaker 30Speaker 22Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport Legislation CommitteeAdditional Estimates 2025–26Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport Legislation Committee, 10 Feb 202618166
Transcript
Speaker 30
>> Okay. Uh just moving on to another topicin the October estimates I think thedepartment responded uh to my questionson notice and this was the question. Howmany complaints has the departmentreceived from farm transparency projectin relation to animal cruelty atslaughter houses? And the answer Ireceived was seven complaints all ofwhich it said resulted in regulatoryaction being undertaken.Was this regulatory action undertaken bystate or federal governments?
Speaker 22
>> Senator Tom Black, first assistantsecretary sports and veterary servicesdivision. uh in the context of theregulatory action that would be referredto in the answer to the quan that wouldhave been action taken by the regulator.
Speaker 30
So the commonwealth>> to the commonwealth yes because I knowthat there's often some argu and thesecomplaints are passed from the state tothe federal government. Often the statesays it's federal government and thefederal government says it's state butobviously it's clear that regulatoryaction on these issues can be taken by
Speaker 22
the federal government. reg regulatoryaction against the condition. Soconditions can be posed against theregistration of the export registered
Speaker 30
establishment.>> Yep. And could you I know it's sevenactions. So if you could provide whatregulatory action was undertaken as aresult of each complaint on notice, I'dreally appreciate that.>> I can do that, Senator.>> Yeah. Thank you. Uh, and just on theanimal welfare strategy, um, can someoneplease provide me with an update onwhere we're at with with that, theAustralian animal welfare strategy?