The Minister defends the regulatory separation between policy development and compliance enforcement regarding industrial emissions and the role of the Clean Energy Regulator.
Speakers: Hon Tim Ayres, David Pocock, Unknown Speaker, Varun Ghosh, Susan McDonald
IntegrityEmissions reductionFossil fuelsHon Tim AyresDavid PocockUnknown SpeakerVarun GhoshSusan McDonaldSenate Environment and Communications Legislation CommitteeSupplementary Budget Estimates 2026–27Senate Environment and Communications Legislation Committee, 26 Oct 202619561
Transcript
Susan McDonald
Last question.
David Pocock
>> Yeah, sure. Well, maybe to you,Minister. Um, what do you have to sayaboutChevronuh and their methane links leaks andjust the lack ofI guess you know clearly they're not agood corporate citizen if this is thethe way that they are um treatingAustralia and the and the public.
Hon Tim Ayres
So, I've just reviewed the article thatyou've referred to, which um appears torelated to independent satellitemonitoring of the facility.and I think uh I think an assertion herethat in late August recorded an averageemission rate of about 7.8 tons ofmethane an hour. you used a figureearlier. I'm not quite sure. I I I Ididn't quite catch it. Umuh and it appears that there is not asettle just from reading the article,not a settledapproach. Maybe there is with theregulator in in Western Australia as theofficials outlined to you.the the department's job here is as athe the regulator's job in this case theCER and the stateuh you know the Western Australianregulatoruh have a function to discharge todeliver on the integrity uh of thepolicy measuresum and that that requires annualuh emissions measurement and I assumeparticularly at the state level somecomplianceum uh more granular work. Now this willbe the subject of discussions betweenthe regulators and Chevron. They willcome up with a settled approach to howyou know is is there more thananticipated?Is is that result of some engineeringdefect or is it a you know what is whatare the circumstances here? Nobody inthis room knows. Um there are there arestringent rules in place umuh to monitor emissionsthrough the safeguard mechanism and theCER is responsible for discharging thatwork and they will be able to answerthose questions to the extent that theycan. Officials here are not regulators.They are they are doing the policy work.
David Pocock
>> No, I accept that minister but it's gotto be someone's responsibility. We allpay the the price for carbon um carbonum in the atmosphere and climate change.And it seems to me when you look atwhat's happened with Santos up in Darwinand their you know leaking tank thanksto Konico Phillips and how that was justnot reported for for years and then thisone with Chevron where we hear after thefact and it doesn't it seems like it'sfalling between WA regulator and theCommonwealth. Um
Hon Tim Ayres
>> no it no that's not that's not it hasn'tfallen in between. There there is athere is the clean energy regulator andthe western Australian regulator. Theyhave duties to discharge. They will bedischarging them. The clean energyregulator will be here in you knowminutes or hours time to answerquestions about that. Um if there's somedeficiency there they will account forthat um for that issue. The officialswho are here now are policy officials>> and and and and they should and theycannot and should notintervenein indivi because that that underminesthe integrity of the compliancemechanism. Uh that's what that's whatthe clean energy regulator is there todo. That's what the western Australiansystem is there to do.
David Pocock
>> It's debatable.
Hon Tim Ayres
>> Um ask well>> I don't approach these set of issueswith the cynicism that that thatinterjection evidences. I just say theyare accountable for that work. um theywill be here to answer questions thatwork. The officials here cannot help youon the on the individual ins and outs ofan individual facility and itsemissions. Uh the story appears to sayum I've lost the link to it. Um uh circauh 7.8>> um 7.8 tons of methaneum an hour. Now, that is serious becauseit's methane. It's got a it's got a moreum it's got bigger climate effect thanthan CO2 does. Um but the it's wellwithin the scope of the regulator todeal with those questions and they'll beable to no doubtuh alerted by this discussion, you know,come here able to answer those